S o T o S p e a k | Ep. 21 | Ending Whiteness

I want to make something clear.

Libertarianism and national socialism refer to methods of conflict resolution. The former is limited to the scope of settling property disputes and keeping the peace whereas the latter depends on some degree of expropriation, monopolization, and institutionalized trespass against private property for the purpose of stimulating industry and social spending.

They can both be used to justify white nationalism, but they’re both equally insufficient as the basis of group identity because the identity of a group can’t be reduced solely to the method by which the group addresses physical conflicts.

When I say that I’m a libertarian, I don’t mean that I organize or associate with people on the basis of some shared libertarian ideology. I don’t even identify as a libertarian first. In reality, I identify, organize, and associate with people on the basis of genetic, cultural, and physical proximity, all of which are upstream from public policy. When I say that I’m a libertarian, I just mean that I prefer libertarian property norms as a means by which to avoid and address property disputes between myself and people who prefer law and order because such norms minimize conflict and maximize standards of living when people agree to abide by them.

People who don’t agree to abide by the libertarian property norms of first use and consensual exchange should be excluded from appealing to the non-aggression principle in their own defense when state violence is used against them.

And state violence should be used against them. It’s almost perfectly consistent with libertarianism to use state violence against people who reject the non-aggression principle. The only real victims in such cases are the taxpayers who are forced to incur the associated costs, though their tax burden would probably still be less than if such malcontents were allowed to freely trespass within their countries.

I know I’d certainly look at mass deportations as tax money well spent.

Christopher @Cantwell asks libertarians: What has the non-aggression principle done to prevent parents from being forced to hire mentally unstable gender confused dickgirls as teachers for their children? The answer, of course, is nothing. That doesn’t mean it’s not useful; it just means it doesn’t prevent conflicts when people don’t agree to adhere to it. It only works when the other person reciprocates. That’s why people who don’t adhere to it must not be allowed to appeal to it in their own defense.

In reality, rights are not “inalienable”. They’re normative. They’re established to avoid and address conflicts over the use of human bodies and the physical resources those bodies employ. They necessarily depend on a natural reciprocity that only tends to exist in high trust, homogeneous white communities. Libertarianism is thus implicitly white nationalist.

Also covered: South African white genocide, campus epidemic of anti-white hatred, and more!

S o T o S p e a k | Ep. 20 | WN Bloodsports

This is episode TWENTY of So to Speak with Jared Howe. Today’s episode is the recent debate on libertarianism and national socialism between myself and Matthew Heimbach, hosted by the Goyfellas and Sinatra Says.

I don’t have the time today to provide you with more of a summary so please enjoy!

S o T o S p e a k | Ep. 19 | Throat of Whiteness

Red pill me on this, goy. What is the “throat of whiteness”? Whatever it is, they’re looking to slit it down in South Africa where white people are literally hunted for sport.

So much for all the Jewish kvetching about how white genocide isn’t really happening — even Glenn Beck is admitting it now, cuck that he is. Zimbabwe was the template for South Africa, which will be the template for the US, Canada, Australia, and Europe if immigration from the third world continues unabated.

Don’t worry though, goy. They don’t need the productivity of white men because they can just “print money and make everyone billionaires”. No way that could go wrong.

Hang on to your jimmies, we’ll be discussing all this and more on this NINETEENTH episode of So to Speak w/ Jared Howe. 

S o T o S p e a k | Ep. 18 | Killing Dissent

The anit-white left and the Jews who control it aren’t fucking around when it comes to stomping out those who oppose their agenda. If they can’t kill the means by which you propagate information they don’t like, they’ll just kill you.

Skeptical of man’s role in climate change? They want you dead. Don’t think white, western countries should be forced to absorb half of the third world? They want you dead. Don’t think Hillary Clinton should be able to get away with selling political favors, rigging the 2016 Democratic primaries against Bernie Sanders, or using the government to spy on an electoral opponent? They want you dead. Have information that proves Russia is being blamed for the actions of Seth Rich? They want you dead. Think white people have a right to exist as white people and be left alone in the countries their forebears settled and built from scratch? They want you dead. Think disparities in intelligence and outcomes between racial groups are more a product of biology than environment? They want you dead. Believe in conservative or Christian values? They want you dead. Think gender and race are a function of genetics and biology? They want you dead. Believe in private property rights and the right to keep and bear arms?

They want you dead.

Welcome to episode EIGHTEEN of So to Speak w/ Jared Howe.

S o T o S p e a k | Ep. 17 | Due Process Second

It’s episode SEVENTEEN of So to Speak w/ Jared Howe and I’m wrestling my jimmies back into their locked and unrustled position after Trump’s comments yesterday on gun control.

Needless to say, the J-left was chomping at the bit over the prospect of banning semi-automatic rifles and increasing the legal age for firearm purchases, but none were more excited than Diane Feinstein, who was seen wringing her filthy chicken-swinging hands in glee.

So we’ll be covering that, but we’ll also be going over the recent happenings at the Federal Reserve, doing some Wakanda posting, and checking in on Marine Le Pen’s situation in France where she’s being charged with criminal penalties for calling out ISIS online.