Everywhere you look, self-appointed right-wing “thought leaders” are arguing in furtherance of Russian geopolitical objectives under the pretext that doing so will weaken America, thereby striking a blow at the heart of GloboHomo.
The problem is that GloboHomo isn’t a uniquely American phenomenon. Further, all sides of international conflict are always funded by the same people as a pretext to erase borders between nations and, more importantly, national banks. “Give me the power to issue a nation’s currency and I care not who writes its laws.” The global elite identify even more strongly with this statement when you substitute “nation” with “world.”
Dugin’s “Fourth Political Theory” is proposed as an alternative to GloboHomo, but it’s really just a rebranding of Marxist globalism where there are multiple, parallel seats of political power in a plurality of countries (a “multi-polar order”) instead of a “uni-polar order” where only one country is the seat of global political power. He characterizes it as an inevitable reaction to the triumph of “liberalism” over “fascism” and “communism” — as though world wars were fought between ideologies rather than countries. In reality, his theories are really just political Three-card Monte on a global scale that, if implemented, would make it even more difficult to determine who is pulling the strings from behind the curtain.
At the end of the day, there’s only about a c-hair’s worth of breathing room between “multi-polar” Fourth Positionism, neoconservatism, and “woke” racial Marxism. Any conflict between them is staged, fake, and gay. Ukraine, for example, is most likely just a pretext to bring Marxists, Neocons, and Fourth Positionists to the table to negotiate the terms of erasing the borders between Europe and Asia.
We are being given a false choice between three paths that all go to the same place.
This is EPISODE 828 of So to Speak w/ Jared Howe!
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
